The Continuous Decision System Behind SIRP

How Autonomous SOC Works

An Autonomous SOC is a security operations model where AI systems independently detect, investigate, decide, and respond to defined classes of incidents within governance boundaries.

Unlike traditional SOAR platforms that automate static workflows, an Autonomous SOC evaluates live context, computes risk dynamically, selects a response, and executes actions based on policy and confidence thresholds.

The goal is not to replace analysts. The goal is to redesign how security decisions are made.

How Autonomous SOC Works

The Continuous Decision System Behind SIRP

The Continuous Decision System Behind SIRP


An Autonomous SOC operates as a continuous security decision system.


Instead of routing alerts through manual queues and static workflows, SIRP continuously ingests signals, constructs relational context, computes risk, enforces policy boundaries, executes response actions, and learns from every outcome — in real time.


This page explains how that decision loop operates.


An Autonomous SOC is a security operations model where AI systems independently detect, investigate, decide, and respond to defined classes of incidents within governance boundaries.


Unlike traditional SOAR platforms that automate static workflows, an Autonomous SOC evaluates live context, computes risk dynamically, selects a response, and executes actions based on policy and confidence thresholds.


The goal is not to replace analysts. The goal is to redesign how security decisions are made.


Architecture Overview

Architecture Overview

A Continuous Security Decision Pipeline

A Continuous Security Decision Pipeline

SIRP functions as a closed-loop Autonomous SOC built around six core layers:

  1. Signal ingestion

  2. Relational context construction (OmniMap)

  3. Risk evaluation (OmniSense)

  4. Policy validation

  5. Autonomous execution (Agentic Mesh)

  6. Decision memory and learning (OmniFlex)

These layers operate continuously as environment state changes.

Security operations are not processed per ticket — they are evaluated as an evolving system state.

SIRP functions as a closed-loop Autonomous SOC built around six core layers:

  1. Signal ingestion

  2. Relational context construction (OmniMap)

  3. Risk evaluation (OmniSense)

  4. Policy validation

  5. Autonomous execution (Agentic Mesh)

  6. Decision memory and learning (OmniFlex)

These layers operate continuously as environment state changes.

Security operations are not processed per ticket — they are evaluated as an evolving system state.

Step 1: Signal Ingestion

Step 1: Signal Ingestion

Continuous Telemetry Across the Environment

Continuous Telemetry Across the Environment

SIRP continuously ingests telemetry from across the security ecosystem, including:

  • Identity providers and access systems

  • Endpoints and device telemetry

  • Cloud infrastructure and SaaS platforms

  • Network security controls

  • Threat intelligence feeds

  • Asset and vulnerability platforms

  • Existing SIEM, EDR, IAM, and XDR systems

Signals are normalized into structured entities.

Identities, assets, devices, sessions, and behaviors become part of a unified operational model.

This ensures complete, real-time visibility into environment state.

SIRP continuously ingests telemetry from across the security ecosystem, including:

  • Identity providers and access systems

  • Endpoints and device telemetry

  • Cloud infrastructure and SaaS platforms

  • Network security controls

  • Threat intelligence feeds

  • Asset and vulnerability platforms

  • Existing SIEM, EDR, IAM, and XDR systems

Signals are normalized into structured entities.

Identities, assets, devices, sessions, and behaviors become part of a unified operational model.

This ensures complete, real-time visibility into environment state.

SIRP continuously ingests telemetry from across the security ecosystem, including:

  • Identity providers and access systems

  • Endpoints and device telemetry

  • Cloud infrastructure and SaaS platforms

  • Network security controls

  • Threat intelligence feeds

  • Asset and vulnerability platforms

  • Existing SIEM, EDR, IAM, and XDR systems

Signals are normalized into structured entities.

Identities, assets, devices, sessions, and behaviors become part of a unified operational model.

This ensures complete, real-time visibility into environment state.

Step 2: Relational Context Construction

Step 2: Relational Context Construction

OmniMap Security Knowledge Graph

OmniMap Security Knowledge Graph

Security is relational. Risk rarely exists in isolation.

OmniMap continuously builds and updates a security knowledge graph that connects:

  • Identities and privilege relationships

  • Devices and asset ownership

  • Cloud workloads and services

  • Applications and access paths

  • Historical incidents and prior responses

This relational intelligence enables:

  • Blast radius estimation

  • Exposure path detection

  • Cross-domain correlation

  • Campaign pattern recognition

Risk is evaluated in context — not as isolated alerts.

Security is relational. Risk rarely exists in isolation.

OmniMap continuously builds and updates a security knowledge graph that connects:

  • Identities and privilege relationships

  • Devices and asset ownership

  • Cloud workloads and services

  • Applications and access paths

  • Historical incidents and prior responses

This relational intelligence enables:

  • Blast radius estimation

  • Exposure path detection

  • Cross-domain correlation

  • Campaign pattern recognition

Risk is evaluated in context — not as isolated alerts.

Security is relational. Risk rarely exists in isolation.

OmniMap continuously builds and updates a security knowledge graph that connects:

  • Identities and privilege relationships

  • Devices and asset ownership

  • Cloud workloads and services

  • Applications and access paths

  • Historical incidents and prior responses

This relational intelligence enables:

  • Blast radius estimation

  • Exposure path detection

  • Cross-domain correlation

  • Campaign pattern recognition

Risk is evaluated in context — not as isolated alerts.

Step 3: Risk Evaluation

Step 3: Risk Evaluation

OmniSense Decision Engine

OmniSense Decision Engine

OmniSense continuously evaluates system state and determines appropriate response actions.

It computes risk dynamically using factors such as:

  • Behavioral deviation from baseline

  • Threat intelligence correlation

  • Identity privilege level

  • Asset sensitivity and exposure

  • Relationship paths identified by OmniMap

  • Historical decision outcomes

For every evaluated event, OmniSense determines:

  • Risk score

  • Confidence level

  • Eligible response actions

  • Execution authorization based on policy

This enables SIRP to determine when containment, restriction, escalation, or investigation is required.

OmniSense continuously evaluates system state and determines appropriate response actions.

It computes risk dynamically using factors such as:

  • Behavioral deviation from baseline

  • Threat intelligence correlation

  • Identity privilege level

  • Asset sensitivity and exposure

  • Relationship paths identified by OmniMap

  • Historical decision outcomes

For every evaluated event, OmniSense determines:

  • Risk score

  • Confidence level

  • Eligible response actions

  • Execution authorization based on policy

This enables SIRP to determine when containment, restriction, escalation, or investigation is required.

OmniSense continuously evaluates system state and determines appropriate response actions.

It computes risk dynamically using factors such as:

  • Behavioral deviation from baseline

  • Threat intelligence correlation

  • Identity privilege level

  • Asset sensitivity and exposure

  • Relationship paths identified by OmniMap

  • Historical decision outcomes

For every evaluated event, OmniSense determines:

  • Risk score

  • Confidence level

  • Eligible response actions

  • Execution authorization based on policy

This enables SIRP to determine when containment, restriction, escalation, or investigation is required.

Step 4: Policy Validation

Step 4: Policy Validation

Governance Before Execution

Governance Before Execution

Autonomy is never unconditional.

Before execution, every decision is evaluated against defined governance policies.

Policies define:

  • Permitted autonomous actions

  • Risk thresholds for containment

  • Asset-specific protection constraints

  • Identity-specific limitations

  • Escalation requirements

Execution authority is determined by policy tier, risk level, and confidence threshold.

If policy conditions are satisfied, response proceeds automatically.

If not, escalation is triggered.

Governance is embedded — not external.

Autonomy is never unconditional.

Before execution, every decision is evaluated against defined governance policies.

Policies define:

  • Permitted autonomous actions

  • Risk thresholds for containment

  • Asset-specific protection constraints

  • Identity-specific limitations

  • Escalation requirements

Execution authority is determined by policy tier, risk level, and confidence threshold.

If policy conditions are satisfied, response proceeds automatically.

If not, escalation is triggered.

Governance is embedded — not external.

Autonomy is never unconditional.

Before execution, every decision is evaluated against defined governance policies.

Policies define:

  • Permitted autonomous actions

  • Risk thresholds for containment

  • Asset-specific protection constraints

  • Identity-specific limitations

  • Escalation requirements

Execution authority is determined by policy tier, risk level, and confidence threshold.

If policy conditions are satisfied, response proceeds automatically.

If not, escalation is triggered.

Governance is embedded — not external.

Step 5: Autonomous Execution

Step 5: Autonomous Execution

Agentic Mesh Response Layer

Agentic Mesh Response Layer

SIRP’s Agentic Mesh executes response actions across integrated security systems.

Agents perform actions such as:

  • Endpoint isolation

  • Identity restriction or access revocation

  • Session termination

  • Network containment

  • Cloud workload isolation

  • Automated investigation workflows

Execution occurs immediately when governance and confidence conditions are met.

After execution, system state updates automatically — and the decision loop continues.

SIRP’s Agentic Mesh executes response actions across integrated security systems.

Agents perform actions such as:

  • Endpoint isolation

  • Identity restriction or access revocation

  • Session termination

  • Network containment

  • Cloud workload isolation

  • Automated investigation workflows

Execution occurs immediately when governance and confidence conditions are met.

After execution, system state updates automatically — and the decision loop continues.

SIRP’s Agentic Mesh executes response actions across integrated security systems.

Agents perform actions such as:

  • Endpoint isolation

  • Identity restriction or access revocation

  • Session termination

  • Network containment

  • Cloud workload isolation

  • Automated investigation workflows

Execution occurs immediately when governance and confidence conditions are met.

After execution, system state updates automatically — and the decision loop continues.

Step 6: Decision Memory and Learning

Step 6: Decision Memory and Learning

Continuous Improvement Through Experience

Continuous Improvement Through Experience

Every decision is recorded as structured decision memory, including:

  • Context evaluated

  • Risk and confidence scores

  • Actions executed

  • Execution outcomes

  • Analyst feedback (when applicable)

This memory feeds back into OmniSense, refining future risk evaluation and response accuracy.

Static systems degrade.

Learning systems compound.

An Autonomous SOC improves as it operates.

Every decision is recorded as structured decision memory, including:

  • Context evaluated

  • Risk and confidence scores

  • Actions executed

  • Execution outcomes

  • Analyst feedback (when applicable)

This memory feeds back into OmniSense, refining future risk evaluation and response accuracy.

Static systems degrade.

Learning systems compound.

An Autonomous SOC improves as it operates.

Every decision is recorded as structured decision memory, including:

  • Context evaluated

  • Risk and confidence scores

  • Actions executed

  • Execution outcomes

  • Analyst feedback (when applicable)

This memory feeds back into OmniSense, refining future risk evaluation and response accuracy.

Static systems degrade.

Learning systems compound.

An Autonomous SOC improves as it operates.

The Continuous Decision Loop

The Continuous Decision Loop

SIRP operates as a continuous autonomous cycle:

Signals update environment state

Relational context recalculates continuously

Risk recomputes dynamically

Policy validates execution authority

Agents execute permitted actions

Decision memory records outcomes

This loop runs continuously across your environment — not per alert, and not per ticket.

Security operations become a governed system process.

SIRP operates as a continuous autonomous cycle:

Signals update environment state

Relational context recalculates continuously

Risk recomputes dynamically

Policy validates execution authority

Agents execute permitted actions

Decision memory records outcomes

This loop runs continuously across your environment — not per alert, and not per ticket.

Security operations become a governed system process.

SIRP operates as a continuous autonomous cycle:

Signals update environment state

Relational context recalculates continuously

Risk recomputes dynamically

Policy validates execution authority

Agents execute permitted actions

Decision memory records outcomes

This loop runs continuously across your environment — not per alert, and not per ticket.

Security operations become a governed system process.

Deployment and Integration

Deployment and Integration

SIRP operates as a decision layer across existing infrastructure.

It does not replace SIEM, EDR, IAM, or cloud security systems — it governs them.

Supported integrations include:

  • SIEM platforms

  • EDR and XDR systems

  • Identity providers

  • Cloud security platforms

  • Network security controls

  • Threat intelligence feeds

SIRP connects across the existing stack and centralizes decision authority within a governed

SIRP operates as a decision layer across existing infrastructure.

It does not replace SIEM, EDR, IAM, or cloud security systems — it governs them.

Supported integrations include:

  • SIEM platforms

  • EDR and XDR systems

  • Identity providers

  • Cloud security platforms

  • Network security controls

  • Threat intelligence feeds

SIRP connects across the existing stack and centralizes decision authority within a governed

SIRP operates as a decision layer across existing infrastructure.

It does not replace SIEM, EDR, IAM, or cloud security systems — it governs them.

Supported integrations include:

  • SIEM platforms

  • EDR and XDR systems

  • Identity providers

  • Cloud security platforms

  • Network security controls

  • Threat intelligence feeds

SIRP connects across the existing stack and centralizes decision authority within a governed

Operational Outcomes Enabled

Operational Outcomes Enabled

This architecture enables organizations to:

  • Respond immediately to emerging threats

  • Enforce policy consistently across environments

  • Reduce incident response latency

  • Minimize manual routing and approval delays

  • Improve decision accuracy over time

  • Maintain governance and auditability

Security operations shift from workflow orchestration to continuous, policy-bound decision systems.

This architecture enables organizations to:

  • Respond immediately to emerging threats

  • Enforce policy consistently across environments

  • Reduce incident response latency

  • Minimize manual routing and approval delays

  • Improve decision accuracy over time

  • Maintain governance and auditability

Security operations shift from workflow orchestration to continuous, policy-bound decision systems.

This architecture enables organizations to:

  • Respond immediately to emerging threats

  • Enforce policy consistently across environments

  • Reduce incident response latency

  • Minimize manual routing and approval delays

  • Improve decision accuracy over time

  • Maintain governance and auditability

Security operations shift from workflow orchestration to continuous, policy-bound decision systems.

See Autonomous SOC in Action

See Autonomous SOC in Action

Understand how SIRP ingests telemetry, computes risk, and executes governed response actions across your environment.

Understand how SIRP ingests telemetry, computes risk, and executes governed response actions across your environment.

Understand how SIRP ingests telemetry, computes risk, and executes governed response actions across your environment.

Watch your Autonomous SOC drive itself

Watch your Autonomous SOC drive itself

Watch your Autonomous SOC drive itself

Self-driving SOC — governed, AI-native security operations.
Powered by OmniSense™

United States

7735 Old Georgetown Rd, Suite 510

Bethesda, MD 20814

+1 888 701 9252

United Kingdom

167-169 Great Portland Street,

5th Floor, London, W1W 5PF

© 2026 SIRP Labs Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Self-driving SOC — governed, AI-native security operations.
Powered by OmniSense™

United States

7735 Old Georgetown Rd, Suite 510

Bethesda, MD 20814

+1 888 701 9252

United Kingdom

167-169 Great Portland Street,

5th Floor, London, W1W 5PF

© 2026 SIRP Labs Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Self-driving SOC — governed, AI-native security operations.
Powered by OmniSense™

United States

7735 Old Georgetown Rd,
Suite 510, Bethesda, MD 20814

+1 888 701 9252

United Kingdom

167-169 Great Portland Street,
5th Floor, London, W1W 5PF

© 2026 SIRP Labs Inc. All Rights Reserved.